How to Write Review of Literature in IGNOU Project > 자유게시판

Many students taking part in IGNOU The review of literature becomes the most confusing component of their project. This is particularly true when working on an ignou project for mcom, in which academic depth is expected, however guidance often appears to be limited. Students usually ask whether they have to write a summary of books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not meant to display the amount of material you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the prior work on your area of study and how your project fits within it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter due to your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three primary functions.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you picked has been researched before and has a scientific significance. Thirdly, it assists you identify gaps or limitations in previous studies. In addition, it can provide a base for your research objectives as well as your method of study.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or online sources. This approach usually results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU insists on original writing, even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. Additionally simple explanations are being discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books journal articles, reports, or even publications from the government that relate to your topic. The emphasis should be placed on studies closely related to your research field.

For example, if you study is about the financial performance of banks, then your literature review should be focused on previous studies that dealt with financial ratios, the performance of banks, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business in the range of 15 to 20 strong sources are usually enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

These are good sources for academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous authors RBI documents, Government reports and university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years, ideally from the last ten years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, divide all the reviews of books into sensible sections.

You can arrange the chapter based on themes, time period research methodology, or other variables investigated. For instance, one section may examine studies that pertain to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and yet another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you're not replicating content but are actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Avoid overly complicated language and terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every study you review should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as the main findings. However, you shouldn't list them chronologically. Try connecting one study with the other.

For example, after analyzing the findings of one study, you could describe how another researcher supported or disputed those findings. This method of comparison adds the depth of your IGNOU Project MCOM [Learn More Here] mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to compose the literature review like it is a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as definition of accounting or meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked to previous research.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in an individual way. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while writing in a copy shows dependency.

They also fail to link the literature to their research area. The research you refer to should have a clear connection your objectives for your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you explain what the previous researchers missed or the areas where more study is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies you will notice that the majority of studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being ignored. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data but primary information was not enough.

This gap can be the motivation for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project may appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however the consistency is more important than perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the list of references at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the writing review must last. There's no definitive rule in the case of an ignou MCOM project this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on how complex the topic is. A larger topic demands greater research, whereas a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

A review that is too long and without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied bank performance and discovered good results

Create this type of writing
For example, author A performed a study examining the performance of banks by using financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This was later validated by Author B who stressed the role of operational efficiency in boosting returns to banks.

This approach is based on understanding and analysis, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. Even if you cite previously published studies, the style should be unique to your project.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review carefully. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if your flow follows logically and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify why my research is necessary. If yes, your review on literature will be in the best track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature to be used in an ignou mcom assignment could be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to school after a long hiatus. Once you realize that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorization of information, the task is easy to handle.

Do your best to read, consider, and write in your own voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final work. It can make the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. well-crafted one.