How to Write Review of Literature in IGNOU Project > 자유게시판

Many students taking part in IGNOU MCOM project writing services (akkrafts.com) review, reviewing literature is often the most difficult aspect of the work. This is especially true for those working on the ignou mcom course, in which academic depth is expected. However, instruction often appears to be limited. Students usually inquire if they are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding how different approaches can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not a report of how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend previous work that pertains to your topic and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, it is crucial to comprehend why the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three main functions.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you have chosen is one that has been studied in the past and is of academic importance. In addition, it allows you to identify any gaps or limitations from earlier studies. The third is that it creates the basis for your research goals and the methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or online sources. This can result in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU requires original work even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. While doing so the use of very basic explanations is also discouraged. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.

You're expected to study research papers, books and reports, as well as journals and sometimes, government publications related to the subject you are researching. The attention should be focused on studies relevant to your research topic.

In the case of example, if your research focuses on the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should focus on earlier studies that dealt with financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou-mcom project about fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice as long as they're carefully chosen.

Good sources include academic journals highly regarded books by well-known writers, RBI publications, government reports, and even university research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current and ideally, from the last ten years. More recent studies can be added only if they are fundamental in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide the literature review into sensible sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period methods, or variables that are studied. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profitability, whereas a different section could focus upon liquidity, while another on operational efficiency.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're more than just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple but academic. Avoid overly complicated language and terminology. IGNOU insists on simplicity over clarity.

The study you are discussing should include the author name, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and main findings. It is not necessary to list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try to connect one study with the other.

For example, after discussing your findings from one study, explain how another author's work supported or refuted the findings. This type of analysis adds complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review like the textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like how accounting works or the meaning of management is not appropriate in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written in you own language. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying implies dependence.

They are also often unable to link literature with their own research area. Each study you discuss should be clearly linked to your goals for the project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluaters want you to explain what the previous researchers missed or if further research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you will notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises while smaller companies were not considered. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary information was not as extensive.

This gap becomes the justification for your an ignou project. Without it, your project may seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the literature review should run. There is no fixed rule to follow, but for an MCOM project this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on your topic's complexity. For a broad topic, you will need additional research while a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write this in the same way as
For example, author A conducted a study on bank performance based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who also emphasized the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profitability.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which can be valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. Even if you cite prior studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if feasible and revise content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom research, read through the review of literature carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether the flow of information is clear and if it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reason why my research is important. If the answer is yes your study's literature reviews are on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou-mcom project may be daunting at first in particular for students who are returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you know that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorization, the project is manageable.

Do your best to read, think and write in your personal voice. This is reflected on your final product and often is the difference between an average submission and a good one.